Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adstuck Consulting

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 10:58, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Adstuck Consulting

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

My searches clearly found nothing better at all and that's not surprising considering the company is somewhat newly founded, there's simply nothing else to suggest keeping and improving. SwisterTwister talk 05:56, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:58, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:58, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:58, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 05:58, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete found no notable sources on Google. Fails GNG. CerealKillerYum (talk) 06:42, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Just commercial blurb. Xxanthippe (talk) 00:27, 7 May 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Delete – A bit of coverage exists (e.g. [1], [2]), but not enough to meet WP:CORPDEPTH for now. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 20:46, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Not notable enough. DeVerm (talk) 02:07, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.