Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advance Steel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 10:16, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Advance Steel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Hardly sourced. Reads like product advertisement. Kleuske (talk) 10:12, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and Software. Kleuske (talk) 10:12, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Same deal as Advance Concrete: reads like an ad, only primary sources, searches bring up nothing significant.Cortador (talk) 11:10, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture and Engineering. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 13:52, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Fails WP:NPRODUCT which requires "sustained coverage in reliable secondary sources." My searches for this product did not produce anything meeting that requirement.  Spintendo  02:52, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: as per above, fails WP:NPRODUCT.--Tumbuka Arch (talk) 08:58, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.