Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Advanced Business Solutions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 10:28, 25 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Advanced Business Solutions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I prodded it with the following rationale: "The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline and the more detailed Wikipedia:Notability (companies) requirement. " It was deprodded by User:Rjd0060 with meaningless rationale "remove old PROD tag". The existing refs and anything else I see online are not reliable or in-depth, IMHO. (Note: there's a bunch of PR spam in the GNews). As I discussed in my Signpost Op-Ed, this is a good example of Yellow-Pages like company spam. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:24, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Hiya - by all means delete this page, the company itself doesn't even exist any more Saigon2010 (talk) 15:12, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• See WP:OUTOFBUSINESS. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:53, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:53, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as searches noticeably found nothing better and there's nothing else particularly better to suggest there's the needed salvageability. SwisterTwister talk 01:00, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:54, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:54, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.