Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adventure science fiction

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:51, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Adventure science fiction (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Entirely unreferenced personal definition of a "genre" that is not critically recognized as discrete or meaningful, or meaningfully defined. No meaningful conent. Linked only to a publisher's now-defunct advertising page. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by administrators since 2006. (talk) 14:50, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - hmm, edit by nominator, no comment. Generally Adventure science fiction / sci-fi adventure is frequently used term, many film pages uses it. Article should be expanded and improved, not delete. Subtropical-man talk
  (en-2) 17:15, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. The term would seem to include all science fiction. It certainly does on Amazon, where the entire list of books on science fiction is a subhead of "action and adventure" --see their [[1] [[2]] pages. DGG ( talk ) 09:09, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science fiction-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:56, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 16:56, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - one could create article for all kinds of genre-mergers. Agreeing with nominator. --Fixuture (talk) 21:18, 25 April 2016 (UTc)
• Weak keep deleted content will need restoring and updating but this seems like a viable article in need of a little care. Artw (talk) 02:39, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as still questionable for its own article. SwisterTwister talk 06:33, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as no references are cited proving the existence of this genre. — Music1201 ^talk 16:10, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.