Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agent unprejudiced

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:42, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Agent unprejudiced

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Poorly sourced article that does not demonstrate notability on the part of the subject. Has been the subject of massive BLP violations. Despite the fact that the article subject is Swedish, there is no article about him on Swedish Wikipedia, and could not find useful references. Risker (talk) 04:35, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Found (some of) the BLP violations, was going to AfD this myself after the problematic edits were taken care of. Subject is not notable, no sources available. Opabinia regalis (talk) 05:44, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no coverage in secondary sources. Kitfoxxe (talk) 05:46, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support non-notable musician. Ack! Ack! Pasta bomb! (talk) 06:39, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - notability is not even asserted through third-party sources. — kikichugirl ^speak up! 07:04, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:07, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:07, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.