Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ahsan Farooq

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. And salt, given the move warring and likely sockpuppetry evident in the article history. Randykitty (talk) 16:51, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ahsan Farooq (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability, see article history, especially this edit by Robert McClenon. One of the "Bot" accounts have been blocked, other account tagged. Toastskat (talk) 10:49, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Toastskat (talk) 10:49, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Toastskat (talk) 10:49, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Toastskat (talk) 10:49, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comment was moved to draft before being moved by one of the "bot" accounts, moved back to draft by @Bearcat:, before the same "bot" accoutn moved it back to mainspace claiming it was approved when the page history makes it very clear it was not approved. Obvious Sockpuppetry going on, paid/coi etc. Lavalizard101 (talk) 12:48, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and salt - Does not satisfy acting notability or general notability. Neither of the roles listed in the Filmography is significant. Moved to draft space twice and moved back to article space, which is indicative of gaming the system. So is the use of editors who are impersonating bots. Those are conduct issues, but the content issue is the lack of notability. There has been enough tendentious moving to article space for ECP protection. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:34, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:47, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete and salt As per Robert McClenon. MrsSnoozyTurtle

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.