Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AirDee (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 00:05, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AirDee (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to fail WP:NMUSIC. He doesn’t meet WP:GNG, the sources are just mentions, subject is only mentioned but never discussed in detail. Xclusivzik (talk) 18:51, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:15, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 19:15, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - fails WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. Potential WP:UPE case.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:22, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - paid-for spam per [1]. MER-C 12:38, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete click my way through 19 references and the second one is blocked due ransomware. my, my. Reference 4 is the same site, blocked as well. Then Reference 7 is lost, Error 1016 Origin DNS error. my, my. Reference 8 tells me, SG: Wearing your Producer hat what makes this album special . I shouldn't wonder. None of the references meet WP:GNG --Whiteguru (talk) 10:47, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.