Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AirVPN

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. WP:REFUND applies. Spartaz ^Humbug! 19:21, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AirVPN (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A VPN site with some sources, however, many are blogs or WP:ROTM coverage, a WP:BEFORE also didn't came up any significant depth. Hence, WP:CORPDEPTH/WP:ORG/WP:GNG not met. Quek157 (talk) 17:15, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• You make some good points. Although I created the article, I'm now on the fence about whether it should be kept or not. However, a precedent seems to have been set regarding articles about VPN services; there are multiple articles about VPN services with various notable computer magazines as its only reliable sources (see Category:Virtual private network services). So if AirVPN is deleted, I guess many of the other articles should be deleted as well. Therefore, maybe instead of only discussing the deletion of AirVPN, it would be better to have a more general discussion regarding articles about VPN services? The list Comparison of virtual private network services has survived a nomination for deletion. TunnelBear and VPNBook have both survived a deletion request since editors argued that the computer magazine sources were enough to demonstrate notability.--Stempelquist (talk) 18:26, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

not willing to list those. not all or nothing. point is that ncorp is strengthened from then, so those may fail. all are non consensus or keep or via non admin closure. fyi only Quek157 (talk) 19:05, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 11:08, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 11:08, 17 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Delete (possibly Soft Delete). The article is just a summary of product reviews, and I doubt the company meets WP:CORPDEPTH. power~enwiki (π, ν) 05:24, 5 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.