Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aircosmo Theory

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Ed (Edgar181) 23:36, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Aircosmo Theory

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Crackpot theory aiming to explain ESP supported by an "article" of 1.5 pages in a predatory journal. PROD removed by article creator. Delete. Randykitty (talk) 14:32, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 14:41, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deete - even if it were published in a legitimate journal it would need to receive notice by someone other than its original author to be notable. Agricolae (talk) 15:54, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete "Aircosmo Theory is a physics theory" — no, it isn't. And it doesn't rise to the standard of being noteworthy pseudoscience, either. XOR'easter (talk) 16:49, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

o Delete Originally PRODed to give article creator a chance to improve content. Clearly a non-notable 'idea' with no independent WP:RS to support it. Having now waded through the source again, I hope the authors didn't have to part with too much cash to get this utter tosh 'published'. WP:BOLLOCKS applies here. Nick Moyes (talk) 09:29, 2 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.