Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Airport Management Professional Accreditation Programme (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. sufficient consensus DGG ( talk ) 04:55, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Airport Management Professional Accreditation Programme

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of notability. This article has previously been deleted (previous AfD nomination), and there is no evidence that its notability has increased. SSTflyer 12:02, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Aviation-related deletion discussions. SSTflyer 12:05, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. SSTflyer 12:05, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. SSTflyer 12:05, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The cited Aviation Week piece talks about "my story". There remains a smell of promotionalism as well as insufficient reliable third-party evidence of notability. The right editor might be able to create a useful article - so let it wait until then. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 19:29, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Management-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 20:24, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as there's nothing to convince solid independent notability can be achieved and the article improved. SwisterTwister talk 05:12, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.