Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aiyshwarya Mahadev

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Vanamonde (Talk) 18:28, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Aiyshwarya Mahadev (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NPOL and WP:GNG — DaxServer (t · m · c) 18:25, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Politicians and India. — DaxServer (t · m · c) 18:25, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women and Karnataka. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 18:28, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete does not pass WP:NPOL. Mccapra (talk) 21:47, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Appears to be a non-notable typical party functionary. A search only return passing mentions and interviews she's given. Curbon7 (talk) 21:47, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Non-notable politician. ---Hey It's Patnaite☝️ (talk) 11:06, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Don't Delete She is National Office Holder and — Preceding unsigned comment added by BootTPP (talk • contribs) 14:57, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What national office? Bearcat (talk) 15:15, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: She is not an elected politician. ​​​​​​​𝐋𝐨𝐫𝐝𝐕𝐨𝐥𝐝𝐞𝐦𝐨𝐫𝐭𝟕𝟐𝟖🧙‍♂️^{Let's Talk !} 16:05, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:NPOL and WP:GNG non elected politician.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 06:13, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, Not an elected politician, fails WP:NPOL. Alex-h (talk) 17:02, 4 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. Holding a bureaucratic role in a political party's internal org chart is not an automatic free pass over WP:NPOL, but the article neither claims that she's held any elected legislative office nor cites sufficiently solid sourcing to get her over WP:GNG. Bearcat (talk) 15:15, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per all of the above, especially Bearcat. There are literally hundreds of such party officials. Bearian (talk) 18:38, 6 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Don't Delete there are lots of national and state office bearer Who have Wikipedia but who is not elected like Rukshmani_Kumari etc — Preceding unsigned comment added by BootTPP (talk • contribs) 07:49, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom etc Devokewater 22:35, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.