Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ajay Kumar Garg Engineering College

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Barkeep49 (talk) 02:12, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ajay Kumar Garg Engineering College (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No WP:RS with a WP:BEFORE. Some paid advertisement, primary sources etc. Does not satisfy WP:NSCHOOLS. Creator is a WP:SPA. Vikram Vincent 14:24, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Vikram Vincent 14:24, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. Vikram Vincent 14:24, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Vikram Vincent 14:24, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:26, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Note to closer for soft deletion: This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing. --Cewbot (talk) 00:02, 7 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Related discussions: 2021-03 ITS Engineering College✗ delete

• Keep Delete Hey V, hate to slightly differ here. I do agree that this doesn't has enough coverage to qualify for WP:ORG. But two things I noticed that might make us wonder if it is a good/major school. Two students of this institute have topped and it was also designated as a research center. In an India Today printed volume [1], it is being referred as a 'prestigious' college and the best in UPTU. Also found an academic book by an Alumnus [2]. I am sure more exists. My sense is that it is a good institute and relevant from a research point of view. I still agree it doesn't have enough coverage for WP:ORG. Let me know what you think. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 04:27, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hi Nomadicghumakkad wouldn't that be a point for future notability of the person rather than the institution since notability is WP:NOTINHERITED? I would say that WP:ORGDEPTH is needed for an article on the institution to stand. WP:NSCHOOLS and WP:GNG are the guiding principles here :-) VV 04:48, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • Nomadicghumakkad I had another look at the India Today article. Only a research centre is being set up. This does not imply that high quality research is an output. For that we would need strong data from a google scholar search with a high H-index. There is no data to show that the award is notable in itself and it was once in 2007-08. The wordings in the article which is highlighted makes it look promotional rather than satisfying WP:CORPDEPTH. VV 06:04, 17 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. WP:NOTYELLOWPAGES, WP:CORPSPAM, fails WP:NORG. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 07:54, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete It's borderline, but Google does not turn up non-trivial mentions in reliable, independent sources. I think this subject could easily become notable in the future, but the article should be recreated then, not be allowed to exist now in anticipation of future notability. Ganesha811 (talk) 14:21, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Unable to identify relevant reliable sources. — Alalch Emis (talk) 18:17, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.