Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akash Ambani (3rd nomination)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Dr vulpes (Talk) 17:04, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
AfDs for this article:
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Akash Ambani (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Keep Withdrawn, not sure how those articles slipped though thanks for being professional and sorry for taking up your time! Dr vulpes (Talk) 17:03, 30 September 2024 (UTC) Article failes WP:GNG, I did WP:BEFORE but couldn't find anything of note. This article was recreated a month or two after the last AfD. Recently it was made into a redirect and an IP editor reverted claiming that the last AfD was not a delete but a no consensus. This is not true, the last AfD was a delete, the current article does not meet pass notability. Dr vulpes (Talk) 05:57, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- I did not see the second AfD where it ended as a no consensus. Dr vulpes (Talk) 05:59, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Dr vulpes: Yes, the IP is correct. The second AfD resulted in ‘No consensus,’ and although it was sent to deletion review, the outcome was still ‘Endorsed.’ GrabUp - Talk 06:48, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Keep passes WP:GNG the subject has received coverage particularly after he became the chairman of Reliance JIO India's largest telecom company and one of the most important corporate positions in India. It is the third largest mobile network operator in the world. Note the coverage listed below about the subject is due to the fact he is the Chairman of Reliance JIO not because of his being Mukesh Ambani's son and hence WP:NOTINHERITED does not apply here.Further How one becomes Chairman or President or director is not a concern as far notability is concerned Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 06:07, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
References
- @Pharaoh of the Wizards: The Economic Times article you cited in the first position is a paid/sponsored WP:NEWSORGINDIA article, as it is published by ‘ET Spotlight Special.’ It also has a disclaimer at the end stating: ‘This content is authored by an external agency. The views expressed here are those of the respective authors/entities and do not represent the views of The Economic Times (ET). ET does not guarantee, vouch for, or endorse any of its contents, nor is it responsible for them in any manner whatsoever.’ GrabUp - Talk 07:40, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Also, the majority of the articles you cited are not authored by any named journalists, but rather by a generic ‘NewsDesk.’ Therefore, I believe these fall under WP:NEWSORGINDIA. GrabUp - Talk 07:42, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think it's a useful exercise to dismiss that entire lot of a dozen sources wholesale. Five of the 12 show up in green on the source highlighter tool. From a random check, this source looks like secondary SIGCOV, has a named author, and the publisher's reliability is backed by community consensus at WP:SCMP. Left guide (talk) 10:53, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Left guide: I did not dismiss all cited sources. I said the majority of sources are not from any named journalists, but from generic names, which makes me think these sources are likely WP:NEWSORGINDIA. South China Morning Post is not under WP:NEWSORGINDIA, in case you didn’t know. GrabUp - Talk 11:09, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Got it; citation #6 in the above list (Financial Times) also appears to have the same set of aforementioned traits as the SCMP piece: secondary SIGCOV, named author, and deemed generally reliable by community consensus at WP:RSP. Left guide (talk) 11:20, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Left guide: I did not dismiss all cited sources. I said the majority of sources are not from any named journalists, but from generic names, which makes me think these sources are likely WP:NEWSORGINDIA. South China Morning Post is not under WP:NEWSORGINDIA, in case you didn’t know. GrabUp - Talk 11:09, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- I don't think it's a useful exercise to dismiss that entire lot of a dozen sources wholesale. Five of the 12 show up in green on the source highlighter tool. From a random check, this source looks like secondary SIGCOV, has a named author, and the publisher's reliability is backed by community consensus at WP:SCMP. Left guide (talk) 10:53, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Also, the majority of the articles you cited are not authored by any named journalists, but rather by a generic ‘NewsDesk.’ Therefore, I believe these fall under WP:NEWSORGINDIA. GrabUp - Talk 07:42, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- @Pharaoh of the Wizards: The Economic Times article you cited in the first position is a paid/sponsored WP:NEWSORGINDIA article, as it is published by ‘ET Spotlight Special.’ It also has a disclaimer at the end stating: ‘This content is authored by an external agency. The views expressed here are those of the respective authors/entities and do not represent the views of The Economic Times (ET). ET does not guarantee, vouch for, or endorse any of its contents, nor is it responsible for them in any manner whatsoever.’ GrabUp - Talk 07:40, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople and India. Shellwood (talk) 09:33, 30 September 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.