Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akash Deo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 03:11, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Akash Deo

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Proposing for deletion. Failed CSD: A7 and PROD; Notability is heavily contested and missing references to some key points that I wasn't able to locate. Dane2007 (talk) 08:18, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep agree that the references need improving, but think he is notable for representing Nepal at scientific conferences and also for winning scientific prizes so passing WP:Bio. Offline sources can hopefully be provided by Nepali editors. Atlantic306 (talk) 17:09, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:24, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nepal-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:24, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:24, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not remotely meeting meeting WP:Prof on basis of scientific work with 12 cites for only one paper on GS. Does not pass WP:GNG. Far, far WP:Too soon. Xxanthippe (talk) 04:40, 3 August 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Delete as nothing at all actually convincing for any applicable notability. SwisterTwister talk 07:16, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. SPA-created page lacking WP:RS on a young 20-something who has hardly any citations: "representing Nepal at scientific conferences" is not notable. Agricola44 (talk) 13:43, 3 August 2016 (UTC).[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.