Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al abbas charitable foundation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:52, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Al abbas charitable foundation

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completely fails the notability requirements for organizations, and the article is completely uncategorized and written in a promotional way. Gaismagorm (talk) 14:23, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Law, Organizations, Education, and Maharashtra. Gaismagorm (talk) 14:23, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:33, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Because of course this article has two versions of the article in the mainspace given its history and attempts at WP:GAMENAME, this was duplicated. I'll copy and paste my deletion rational from Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al Abbas charitable foundation:

AI generated spam that that is little more than an advertisement masquerading as an article. Article focus bounces back and forth from "Al Abbas" and his multiple companies/foundations/etc. Copy and paste moved to mainspace. However, let's just cut right to notability and not bother sending this back to draft space:

Non-notable lawyer who fails the GNG or ANYBIO.

All the sources are routine news coverage about things the subject may have truly been involved in, but there is no in-depth significant coverage that warrants a standalone article. Nominating delete, no time in the draftspace will salvage an article where the subject is not notable.

Summarily delete as non-notable, don't bother sending this back to the draft space. Bobby Cohn (talk) 16:02, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per nom, 100% LLM generated promotional spam, and same for the other AfD as well. (Also why is there two??) Sophisticatedevening ^(talk) 18:54, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
there was (for some reason) two diffferent articles under different capitalization. It's weird. Gaismagorm (talk) 19:01, 11 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, I am so confused by why are there two articles about the same topic in mainspace and both nominated for deletion at the same time? Anyways, the article does not pass notability standard even with the sourcing of the article and the sources I found online. ToadetteEdit (talk) 10:05, 12 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:PROMO. Fails WP:NORG. Madeleine (talk) 03:17, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NORG. two articles with same name in the deletion discussion. Gauravs 51 (talk) 05:32, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Per the nomination. Taabii (talk) 13:17, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Insufficient coverage by independent, reliable secondary sources to pass WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 19:29, 15 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete WP:TNT this. - Imcdc Contact 07:12, 18 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.