Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albany Software

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MER-C 04:08, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Albany Software

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable organization. Nothing significant than some company like over thousands in the world. For being in wikipedia need to be much more significant than this. Else Wikipedia will become a directory for companies like this. Light2021 (talk) 14:44, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:06, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:06, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:06, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No evidence of notability, GNews hits for "albany software" are for software companies based in Albany, company has been bought - David Gerard (talk) 17:21, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as this is actually A7 material if not for the blatantly thin and PR claims of "a known company client", none of this comes close at all for being actually substantially convincing and then non-PR. This is essentially nothing but a business listing, and that's not what is acceptable here. SwisterTwister talk 22:24, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Zero evidence of WP:CORP notability. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 23:17, 24 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:PROMO; nothing but a corporate blurb. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:44, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.