Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alejandro Badia (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 03:34, 23 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alejandro Badia

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be a resume. The majority of the content is unsourced, and of the 6 sources, 3 are just patents/trademarks, one is a self-published book by the subject, and the last two appear to be press releases. Looking online I can find more PR content, but nothing truly independent. Bilby (talk) 09:43, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Bilby (talk) 09:43, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Medicine, Cuba, and New Jersey. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:05, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete appears to be a resume, I find no other sources. Oaktree b (talk) 14:49, 14 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 12:20, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non-notable individual with not enough coverage in third party reliable sources. Tinton5 (talk) 23:58, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.