Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alex Alexsandra
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. North America1000 02:58, 8 September 2016 (UTC)
Alex Alexsandra
- Alex Alexsandra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Alexsandra is not notable as a magician or philanthropist. The coverage of her work has been too minor to pass the GNG. John Pack Lambert (talk) 23:41, 15 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:17, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Thailand-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 15:25, 19 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:29, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:29, 23 August 2016 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:28, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:28, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete I made a good faith search for significant coverage in reliable sources, and found nothing. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 01:19, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete insufficient sources, fails WP:GNG The Banner talk 19:59, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete -- no indications of notability; vanity page. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:25, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.