Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Augustus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. RL0919 (talk) 03:24, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander Augustus

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject of article lacks in-depth significant coverage in reliable sources hence falls short of WP:GNG. Celestina007 (talk) 03:15, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 03:15, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 03:15, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 03:15, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Celestina007 (talk) 03:15, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete there is an Australian Alexander Augustus Pentland who is very notable. The Alexander Augustus is not, due to very slim coverage.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 03:33, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete a non-notable artist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:44, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Non-notable, as is the "movement" he is associated with The Bite Back Movement which is also up for deletion. Maybe in a few years, but at this time does not pass WP:NARTIST. Netherzone (talk) 16:10, 2 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete artist is not yet notable.NotButtigieg (talk) 12:54, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete - some coverage in Time Out, but that might not be significant enough. It could be a redirect target. Bearian (talk) 18:02, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.