Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alexander Khateeb

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 09:43, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alexander Khateeb (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:BIO, has no notable achievements under WP:GNG and WP:NMOTORSPORT, only two sources and both are deadlinks. MSportWiki (talk) 10:48, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Motorsport, Lebanon, and United Kingdom. MSportWiki (talk) 10:48, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 11:16, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Agree, clearly and signally fails WP:GNG, Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 13:03, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment - while this does appear to be a failure of notability, "both sources are dead links" is *not* a valid rationale for deletion. - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:46, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Respectfully disagree - if the sources are not considered important enough to be archived, deadlinks are a valid indication of notability (or lackthereof). MSportWiki (talk) 09:19, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.