Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alicia Endemann (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn by nominator with no outstanding delete votes.

Alicia Endemann

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Was previously deleted at AfD; recntly recreated Boleyn (talk) 20:22, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I fail to understand how someone who has become top model (Miss germany) in a country of 80 million people isn't notable. If a writer won the top national literary award, or a musician won the top national music award, we wouldn't be having this discussion. Endemann also has some prominence as an actor. Sionk (talk) 21:43, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:56, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural keep. National title-holder who has represented her country at an international level in one of the main pageants. There is precedent for considering such articles notable at a basic level. It needs some basic rewording but it is a fair enough basic stub with sufficient sourcing. Mabalu (talk) 02:03, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as a WP:GNG pass. Major, national-level beauty pageant titleholder, who went on to compete in the internationally televised and publicized Miss Universe 2012 pageant. Ejgreen77 (talk) 03:31, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination withdrawn When it was last at AfD (2012) there was a different response, resulting in delete. However, I'm happy to withdraw my nomination based on the opinions given above. Boleyn (talk) 07:01, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - The previous delete vote was EXTREMELY close - almost virtually a no consensus. I was surprised it was actually deleted, but I can imagine it was an extremnely close run thing. Mabalu (talk) 09:30, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.