Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Allianz De Architecture

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 14:51, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Allianz De Architecture

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Speedy delete. Rubbish sources. No reliable, significant coverage exists. Clearly not notable. Fails all guidelines. MaysinFourty (talk) 10:19, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:20, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:20, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:20, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The sourcing here is not enough to show notability. Having spent the last week or so going through subcats of Category:1999 establishments I have realized this is true of lots of articles. It is shocking how many articles in that category are only sourced to the website of the article subject.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:13, 24 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - zero evidence of notability Spiderone 18:09, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, a quick before search shows that it has no independent or significant coverage at all. Tayi Arajakate _Talk 09:58, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.