Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alpha education

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Joseph Yu Kai Wong.  Sandstein  16:10, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Alpha education (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Promotionally worded article which is unsupported by any of the sources given. Cabayi (talk) 07:30, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 07:31, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: Hi! Quick note - this was part of a student assignment with Western University, so it wasn't meant to be promotional. I'll talk this over with the student and see if there is a way to possibly save the article. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 08:13, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Something to take into consideration is that the organization's founder, Joseph Yu Kai Wong, has an article. If this isn't considered to be independently notable, we (by which I mean the student or any other interested party) could selectively merge some information into the parent article. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 08:16, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Cabayi (talk) 11:19, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:36, 11 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

• Selective Merge to Joseph Yu Kai Wong, to provide more context about the organization. Some sources exist (e.g. [1], [2], [3]), but not finding enough coverage to qualify a standalone article. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:25, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:54, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.