Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alphonse Joseph

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 12:03, 14 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alphonse Joseph (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Neither of the two entries is a compound given name. Alphonse Joseph Georges has an article in the French wikipedia titled Alphonse Georges and a New York Times article about him also calls him Alphonse Georges. As for Alphonse Joseph Glorieux, his French wikipedia article is titled Alphonse Glorieux, a newspaper article refer to him the same way,[1] and his English article says "Alphonse Glorieux was born on ..." Clarityfiend (talk) 11:22, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 11:56, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, overzealous creation of namecruft. People who type in Alphonse Joseph in the search box will have both names come up there. Geschichte (talk) 19:39, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom; these are partial-title matches that shouldn't be on a DAB page. Walsh90210 (talk) 19:42, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom and others. Not much justification for this page existing; Alphonse Joseph is for one a random given/middle name combination, not a given name as the article incorrectly states. Because of the unlikelihood of someone to be referred to by their first and middle names, such indexes are not typically created on Wikipedia, and we can see that they are indeed not referred to as "Alphonse Joseph" per the sources that nom gives. AllTheUsernamesAreInUse (talk) 17:27, 8 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - basically fails WP:OR, and is a useless dab. Bearian (talk) 15:27, 13 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.