Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alt-Libertarian

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:30, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alt-Libertarian (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Appears to be promotion for radicalcapitalist.org and/or the philosophies/politics it represents. The page name itself is almost certainly a neologism and searches only return similar organisations and opinion pieces. The sources provided certinly do not assert notability. A CSDcorp I issued was declined because I first assumed this to be an organised group of people. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:28, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete I was in the process of nominating it myself. This doesn't appear to be a notable topic. There are only two sources cited, a personal blog I've never heard of and a Facebook page, neither of which are reliable sources. A Quest For Knowledge (talk) 23:32, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - A neologism with no reliable source provided, obvious delete. Beyond My Ken (talk) 23:45, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Conservatism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:50, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:50, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:50, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I declined the csd -- I should have realized there was another speedy criterion that did fit well enough. DGG ( talk ) 00:38, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. FreeKnowledgeCreator (talk) 02:00, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - can't find any reliable sources, none suggested by the article.Jacona (talk) 11:39, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• DELETE per Jacona - absence of reliable sources Thalium (talk) 17:33, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Cannot find any reliable sources either. Lacypaperclip (talk) 18:04, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Apart from OR, this seems to be a POV fork of libertarian conservatism and alt-right. --Omnipaedista (talk) 08:37, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Nominator comment: Speedy close please. This article is a 98.7% COPYVIO of 4chan.org, a Wikipedia blacklisted forum. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:50, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • I checked for copyvio here, they appear to have copied from us. TonyBallioni (talk) 13:42, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I missed that. Thanks for pointing it out. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 01:48, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Snow delete because I wanted to get in on the fun. Lepricavark (talk) 01:22, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.