Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amal Jyothi College of Engineering

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 13:01, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Amal Jyothi College of Engineering (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No evidence of nobility. Completely unsourced and promotional article. Fails WP:NSCHOOL, WP:ORG JaiMahadev (talk), 06:46, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• The nominator is blocked/banned. ~ Ase1este_{charge-parity}^time 12:32, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:15, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:16, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:16, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Kerala-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:16, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Engineering-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:22, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - the nomination is blatantly false. This is neither unsourced nor promotional. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:29, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep: The nomination is erroneous. Neither unsourced nor promotional. ~ Ase1este_{charge-parity}^time 12:31, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy keep erroneous nomination by an outed sock puppet. If we discover it in time, I don't think socks should have standing to start AfDs. SportingFlyer T·C 22:44, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. Accredited, degree-awarding tertiary institution. -- Necrothesp (talk) 11:06, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: nom blocked for socking. This should be a proceedural close, noms by socks shouldn't even be considered; if another editor feels this should be deleted, they can renominate and this close should not be considered as a normal Keep in that discussion.  // Timothy :: talk  16:25, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.