Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amazon Village

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SarahStierch (talk) 18:52, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Amazon Village

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

It is just silly of the mayor to say it will be used for academic purposes and for Zaman to say the Amazons are historic. I do not think it is notable enough to be worth spending time improving the article. Jzlcdh (talk) 16:03, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 November 4. —cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 16:22, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 23:57, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 23:57, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. As far as I can tell, it's not notable, but there may be Turkish sources that I'm not seeing. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 07:07, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: This is a museum and all museums deserve a page in WP. The only problem with the article is that it has only one source.(In fact there are many others, but unfortunately they are not in English.) We can ask for more sources but this doesn't call for deletion. Nedim Ardoğa (talk) 10:41, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. As far as I can see based on googling the name, it isn't notable, or maybe non-existent. I couldn't find any information about Amazon Village as museum at all. The page referred to doesn't even contain the word "museum". Yurivict (talk) 03:04, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 05:28, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is not a museum of importance enough to have a page. Not everything that alls itself a museum is a true museum for notability purposes. 'DGG (at NYPL)' (talk) 09:28, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.