Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amit Kumar Pandey

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 20:46, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Amit Kumar Pandey

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A preening article loaded as one of several on JTJ Technologies and their associates: "talented and glamorous", "beautiful dreams in his small eyes", "Degree of engineering has not made him an engineer, he was born an engineer", "the deep eyes of JTJ personel , has made his work with them as a CEO of the company". All of which would be a matter for normal editing were there evidence that the subject has been recognised as attaining notability. I can find none, he appears simply to be a young man with a degree and a job, hence this article joins its associates at AfD. AllyD (talk) 06:17, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:39, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:39, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No reliable sources, no assertion of notability, part of a package of non-notable articles by the same editor, to say nothing of the tone. SchreiberBike talk 00:50, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Vanity article about a non-notable person. Salih (talk) 06:15, 21 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete should have been speedied.—indopug (talk) 13:01, 23 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:GNG , the article has been written like an advertisement. All the references are from his website and his company's website.--Skr15081997 (talk) 08:14, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. This almost seems like a parody of a Wikipedia article. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:46, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.