Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amit Mehra

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 16:39, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Amit Mehra (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable actor or model. -- Syed A. Hussain Quadri (talk) 09:04, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People, Actors and filmmakers, Artists, India, and Maharashtra. Syed A. Hussain Quadri (talk) 09:04, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment seems to have some things which would suggest notability. Found this article [[1]] which seems to suggest he was the first Indian to place in the top 12 at Mr. Universe. It also appears that he starred (though I do not know how prominent his role was!) on the notable production Arjun Patiala, with some media coverage of this. He also has an instagram account with over 300k followers, and though this does not establish notability and I do not claim it does, it definitely is a positive for someone in his line of work and demonstrates a degree of popularity that maybe is not reflected in his article as stands.Spiralwidget (talk) 16:29, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment I tried to improve the article to remove uncited material to give an impression of what I think the article could look like. Spiralwidget (talk) 17:19, 19 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 20:08, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• In een effort to improve the article, inserted image in infobox, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lotje (talk • contribs)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:08, 3 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Most of the sources are just passing mentions. Azuredivay (talk) 05:19, 4 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Final relist.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 23:58, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete lacks indepth coverage fails WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 20:12, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The CineBuster article, for example, is in-depth (although it raises a small copyright issue), and other sources allow verifiability for someone who passes WP:NACTOR with various (not all) significant roles in notable productions and has clear notoriety as Mr. Universe India. Needs rework more than deletion, I think.-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 03:57, 13 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete this non-notable model who has appeared in a few acting roles, not major. The article was created by an account whose sole purpose was to promote barely-known actor/models, suggesting COI. Doczilla _{Ohhhhhh, no!} 07:44, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: coverage for winning the Mr. Universe India, and being the first Indian to place in the top 12 worldwide in the event, is enough to meet GNG. His filmography meeting NACTOR is a bonus. Owen× ☎ 14:42, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.