Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amit Shekhar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --BDD (talk) 20:16, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Amit Shekhar

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Claims are all of trivial works related to films, like working in digital promotion and such. Some work as writer and/or asst. director seem very trivial (if at all are proven true through WP:RS). References are from IMDb (non-RS) and self-published sources like facebook. Many other sources don't even support the claims made. The creator is also possibly the subject himself. (Geez! Working in digital promotion; so what more should we expect.) §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 11:26, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non-notable; references aren't valid; most credits are insignificant. (Digital promotion? Really?) JSFarman (talk) 23:09, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 11:28, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep this article. I have removed the trivial information like digital promotion as per Wiki Editors and putting more references for validity. This articles needs a space on Wikipedia . we will put some more strong references regarding this new article. Thank you so much Wiki Editors for their Valuable suggestions. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vishwadurga (talk • contribs) 10:55, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the objection is not that he is doing digital promotion but that he isn't doing anything worth noting about it. (Btw, what is this "digital promotion"? Tweet and tag and blog and spam everywhere, is it?) Please read WP:GNG to see what "notability" is needed about a person to have a Wikipedia article. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {T/C} 16:19, 13 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:56, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:56, 14 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete trivial coverage only. --Redtigerxyz ^Talk12:50, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
delete sources are not reliable at all. LibStar (talk) 11:04, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The subject is not notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:53, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails notability. — Wylie pedia 15:53, 20 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.