Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amitkumar Prajapati

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 02:04, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Amitkumar Prajapati

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an unsourced autobiography. It was already speedy deleted, but was recreated by the author/subject. The person is not Notable, there are no reliable sources. It is hard to search for sources since there are many people with the same name. Article claims that he is the owner of the "Indian Classified Business Portal", but when searching for that portal, Google search returns no hits [1]. Vanjagenije (talk) 18:39, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 20:57, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 22:59, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Non-notable. The article reads like bad machine translation. Even if there were sources demonstrating notability, we'd probably have to blow it up and start over. —Tom Morris (talk) 23:01, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not even close to satisfying WP:GNG or WP:ANYBIO. Msnicki (talk) 23:09, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Subject clearly is not notable, the article is poorly written, and is likely promotional. --Jersey92 (talk) 03:52, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:57, 13 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wikipedia bans autobiographies for very good reasons. That alone should get such articles deleted.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:28, 14 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This looks appropriate for Linked-In; it is more or less a resume.Jacona (talk) 12:19, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Self-promotion by a non-notable person, using a single-purpose account. Also wins my award of the week for worst use of the English language! RomanSpa (talk) 09:38, 16 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.