Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amplus Energy Solutions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:27, 24 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Amplus Energy Solutions (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NCORP. I have reviewed all of the references. Almost all are press releases, with no secondary coverage at all. A couple of the references don't mention Amplus at all. The remainder are references to the company's own website. Appears to have been created by a paid editor. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:45, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:45, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 15:45, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 19:41, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per nom. -Hatchens (talk) 16:56, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:GNG and promotional article Spiderone 17:36, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nomination. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 18:14, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Thanks for your suggestions. I have reviewed all the references and found that most of the referecences are from top Media houses that are independent and can't be controlled. I editied this article and no paid editor was envolved in same. As I have reviewed, a single reference URL has no Amplus mention but the information was useful for the person who wants to know about it, if you found that link inappropriate, it can be removed from the page. Saurabhews (talk) 11:42, 13 July 2020 (GMT +5:30)

Please note that this vote is from the article creator Spiderone 07:55, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Spiderone for bringing this into everyone's attention. I'm keeping an eye on it. -Hatchens (talk) 04:37, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as per nom. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Woodpeek (talk • contribs) 21:46, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Article looks fine. Prashantpandey31 (talk) 11:34, 14 July 2020 (GMT+5:30)  Checkuser note: Prashantpandey31 is a confirmed sockpuppet of Saurabhews, who commented above. Mz7 (talk) 14:28, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that this vote has come from an account solely created to vote in this AfD Spiderone 07:54, 14 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Spiderone for bringing this into everyone's attention. I'm keeping an eye on it. -Hatchens (talk) 04:37, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Kj cheetham (talk) 20:22, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Keep Article lists awards. The awards earned by the subject support the notion that it is a leader in the industry. Isn't that what we mean by notable?--Pgapunk (talk) 21:26, 17 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Depends on the award. In many industry awards, companies nominate themselves and pay an entry fee. There are lots of categories and a high proportion of entries win, so it is a form of paid advertising rather than a genuine competition. Anyway, winning awards doesn't feature in WP:NCORP or WP:GNG - it is the depth of independent, reliable, secondary coverage that counts. Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 11:29, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per WP:TNT. It would be best now if the article has been created without any history of COI, promotion, etc. Raymond3023 (talk) 15:57, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails GNG/WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 18:30, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, Promotional article that fails WP:GNG , Alex-h (talk) 11:43, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:MILL, WP:TNT, and WP:SPAM. This is a company, one of many, that sells solar panels in the World's largest and sunniest county. If they paid for this poorly-written crap, "they was robbed." In 2008, we would have excused this nonsense, but in 2020, everybody knows Wikipedia is a charity, not a free web host for your for-profit business. Bearian (talk) 02:06, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.