Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/An Evening with...

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:14, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

An Evening with...

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Very little context, but there does not seem to be any real assertion of notability for this series of productions. The phrase "An Evening with..." is very common and wasn't coined for this production series, and the article looks like an attempt to promote said series. There are no sources at all, since the official site is dead and there has never been any independent sources since the article was created 8 years ago. bonadea contributions talk 14:29, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It might be worth mentioning that the user who created the article was blocked for operating sockpuppets, all of whom were mainly concerned with promoting Marc Sinden, the person behind this production series. So it's a promo piece from start to finish. --bonadea contributions talk 14:36, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. bonadea contributions talk 14:41, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Marc Sinden as this event is already mentioned on his article with as much information as exists on this separate page and because The One Night Booking Company already redirects to Marc Sinden. The article for the individual seems well referenced, but there's no evidence given for separate notability of this event night so leave it on his page as it already is. -Markeer 21:30, 8 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:21, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:00, 14 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I wouldn't disagree with a redirect, I simply think that this term is too nebulous to represent a valid search. Clearly the article does not pass WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:11, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.