Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anand Mishra (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is that he is not notable. Star Mississippi 01:18, 14 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Anand Mishra

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

He is just a district-level police officer. Every state of India has more than 250 SP-level officers. If created Wiki for a Superintendent of Police level officer, Wikipedia will be spammed. The sources are too local and for a Superintendent of Police, it's his duty to do whatever is mentioned in the article. Every Superintendent of Police does his job and such is published in the newspaper. Why Anand Mishra should be listed and not the more than 150 officers of the same rank or above? - Arunudoy (talk) 03:01, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The page creator cleverly created the page after another page with the same name is deleted. Hence, I, couldn't create AfD page as it redirects to the duplicate page that was deleted, and then this page was created. - Arunudoy (talk • contribs) 04:47, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:56, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 04:57, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Moved page to proper title. @Arunudoy: There was no need to move the previous discussion page from 2019. This is the proper nomenclature for a second discussion of an article with the same title, even if the articles in question were about different people. No comment (yet) about the current iteration of the article. --Finngall ^talk 16:54, 6 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: All senior police officers are not notable. Only the chief of the entire org can have an article. Fails WP:ANYBIO Venkat TL (talk) 10:43, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Again. Does not meet WP:GNG. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:29, 12 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.