Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew C. Aronson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:39, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Andrew C. Aronson

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I couldn't establish that he meets WP:AUTHOR, WP:PROF or WP:GNG. There is also another academic (psychiatrist) called Andrew C. Aronson. Tagged for notability for nearly 8 years; hopefully we can get it resolved now one way or the other. Boleyn (talk) 22:42, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 05:21, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 05:21, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 05:21, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Career as a prep school (private, elite, expensive secondary school) teacher, with a stint teaching at the University of Maine during which he apparently ran a shop on the side. Author of several books used to teach Latin. The bar to deletion is that his textbooks garnered respectful reviews in academic journals. Borderline.E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:02, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete likely as I found nothing better and there's nothing convincingly better here. Notifying DGG for analysis. SwisterTwister talk 21:31, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. no evidence that the textbooks were widely used outside that small group of schools. DGG ( talk ) 01:13, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Found 2 of his books in WorldCat, which have holdings of 11 and 2. Agricola44 (talk) 17:24, 22 January 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Delete fails GNG BlueSalix (talk) 19:25, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.