Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andria D'Souza

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus.  Sandstein  07:10, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Andria D'Souza (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Though I think the subject may be on the cusp of notability, I think this article is premature. No clear indication that the subject fully meets WP:NACTOR yet, with significant roles in multiple notable films. There may have been a better argument for this had she played the main lead in Faisal Saif's For Adults Only, but that project, (which may in fact have been a publicity stunt for Saif anyway) was shelved.[1] (and the article has since been prodded, so check it out while supplies last). There may be an argument for keeping based on this ref which indicates she has a lead role in another movie. She also apparently has a lead role in Kamasutra 3D, but that hasn't been released yet.

There's no indication the subject meets WP:GNG either. Most of the refs I've found are passing mentions.[2][3][4][5][6][7][8]

I have seen a few interviews, but those seem more like typical publicity pieces, and interviews are typically considered primary sources, so I don't think they qualify as "independent" coverage.[9][10]

I'd recommend a merge if I could think of an intuitive place to merge this content. Alternatively, we could userfy the content until notable films are released. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:57, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not yet notable. The subject (or somebody claiming to be her) has done her best to puff it up, but the notability simply isn't there yet, and may never be. --Orange Mike | Talk 19:52, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK  22:05, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK  22:05, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK  22:06, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. Human3015^TALK  22:06, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: Subject passess WP:NACTOR, multiple mainstream movies as lead actress.--Human3015^TALK  22:11, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Human3015. The Drover's Wife (talk) 08:24, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete The subject doesn't meets WP:NACTOR. The Wikipedia page of Casanova doesn't mention her in the Cast section. She had a minor role in the production. She made a guest appearance in Nirel, another minor role in Looti. Kamasutra 3D hasn't released yet and the page For Adults Only would most likely be merged to the director's article. Her IMDb page mentions 1 TV appearance. I total, this doesn't satisfy the notability guidelines for actors. No encyclopaedic value at the present moment.--Skr15081997 (talk) 11:18, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: - this one passes WP:NACTOR, per lead actress in films.--BabbaQ (talk) 16:50, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• She has played significant role in just 1 film, rest are passing mentions and the film For Adults Only has been shelved.--Skr15081997 (talk) 10:28, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Fails WP:NACTOR: Does not have significant roles in notable projects. - SummerPhD^v2.0 12:38, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• weak keep - marginally notable. Great photo though. DangerDogWest (talk) 18:18, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Struck content from confirmed sock above, per WP:SOCKSTRIKE. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:57, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as I see nothing convincingly better. SwisterTwister talk 07:46, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.