Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Poe

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Kharkiv07 (T) 01:05, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Andy Poe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: non-notable Filipino actor.Does not derive notability from father or brother. Quis separabit? 10:36, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply] This actor has nineteen film credits, but the overwhelming majority of his article on Wikipedia is composed of his personal life, untimely death, and established, powerful family. He does not derive notability for being related to Fernando Poe, Sr., Fernando Poe, Jr. or Conrad Poe. If someone cares to create an article about this family (who seem to be the Kennedys of the Philippines) -- it would probably be appropriate. But Andy Poe does not reach the threshold for notability as an actor. ·Keep:- sources available to attest notability.--Jondel (talk) 05:28, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jondel's vote is meaningless. He has been twice accused of stalking this nominator's AFDs and "Sources available to attest notability" does not satisfactorily comply with Wikietiquette (as per WP:AFD, to wit: "Remember that while AfD may look like a voting process, it does not operate like one. Justification and evidence for a response carries far more weight than the response itself.") Quis separabit? 01:13, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That is good to know Rms125a. It is good you put effort to remove wiki garbage. Do have it deleted if the article is indeed non -notable but I still think it is notable. Anyway I added more sources since then. AfD may not be a full voting process but wikipedia does seem to respect votes and opinions. Allow me to comment that it always seems that the other guy is at fault. There is the onus of ever performing self examination. Here, Rms125a, you were the one of mistakenly accusing me of stalking yourself when these Philippine articles are under the radar of the Filipino community. Stalking is like somebody looking into your window, stealthily following you around for an extended period. I'm not. Your accusations are triple-fucked big time man.--Jondel (talk) 11:55, 1 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:24, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:24, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Meets WP:NACTOR, multiple significant roles in 1960s Filipino films.--RioHondo (talk) 02:52, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Admittedly rose to fame because of his family name. But has independent notability as noted by RioHondo. Multiple significant roles in films.-- OBSIDIAN†SOUL 09:18, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep as appears to meet WP:NACTOR, per above points. --Rubbish computer 17:15, 27 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.