Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andy Vanags

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 22:28, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Andy Vanags

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NPROF. All claimed impacts are at their particular University, not the field in general. Captain Eek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 21:27, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:24, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Latvia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 22:24, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete does not meet any of the notability criteria for academics.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:03, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:20, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Almost everybody is important to their college, except middle management. Bearian (talk) 16:23, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Largely unsourced, reads more like an obituary or personal reflection than an encyclopedia article. Although there is sourcing for the subject, it appears to be entirely local and mostly through his employer, so not independent enough for WP:GNG notability. And although he was an academic, his work appears to have been mainly building things rather than scholarly publication, so WP:PROF isn't appropriate and isn't met. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:36, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.