Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angelfish software

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 00:52, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Angelfish software (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There are no reliable independent sources indicating any notability. Written like a promotion. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 13:38, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Computing and Software. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 13:38, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: Previous nomination: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angelfish (software), apparently unrelated to Angelfish (browser) that is based on Chromium (web browser). Boud (talk) 11:41, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: No coverage in Gnews for the company, many hits on the fish in general. Not seeing NCORP as being met. Oaktree b (talk) 15:35, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Article has been updated with content & refs. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Frozenpizza (talk • contribs) 21:02, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  @Frozenpizza: I don't see any reliable independent sources:

  35 Amazing Web Analytics Tools that Rival Google Analytics

  60 Best Google Analytics alternatives: The Complete List

  Websites like these do not constitute WP:SIGCOV. Deltaspace⁴² (talk • contribs) 07:28, 22 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Business and Internet. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:29, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:17, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: I was hoping for an AtD in the form of a redirect to the maker of this product, but the company isn't notable either, and we rightfully don't have an article for it. Owen× ☎ 15:07, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, fails WP:GNG. The sources in the article are either primary or unreliable. I was unable to find significant coverage in independent, reliable sources on this software. SailingInABathTub ~~🛁~~ 00:24, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.