Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Animal Equality

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was WP:SNOW delete. BD2412 T 14:29, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Animal Equality

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This should really be speedied for being advertisement, but it's been here a while and after all that time, what's another week. The article lacks all secondary sourcing, and while it is possible that there is something, a quick source for the name and the name of the founder delivers nothing. Moreover, I think that this is a case where BEFORE should really apply to the article creator, JesseClifton, and the person who paid them, Vipul: click the link to see to which extent WALLED GARDEN might apply as well, esp. in connection to articles like Jacy Reese Anthis, Sentience Politics, Sentience Institute, and Effective altruism.

The article is almost irredeemably promotional, and might as well be copied and pasted onto the organization's website. For all I know that's where it came from. Drmies (talk) 23:24, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no references, unlikely to be any dibbydib ^boop or _snoop 23:47, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:11, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:11, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:13, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:13, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:13, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:14, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Mexico-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:14, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:14, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:15, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, reads like a PROMO. Cavalryman (talk) 04:32, 21 May 2020 (UTC).[reply]
Delete Promo garbage. -Indy beetle (talk) 09:07, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There seems to be some degree of coverage, but the sources I could find are rather WP:QUESTIONABLE, and wouldn't count towards GNG. In any case, the text of the article is IMO too promotional to be of any use in a rewritten article — WP:TNT applies. (and I don't mean just in favour of the organisation. While it might be a noble cause, well...) I did find a Wired article that I was hopeful about, but it turned out to be a passing mention mainly about another animal rights group. At least there seems to be no new copyvios since it was RD1ed back in 2018. Alpha3031 (t • c) 14:13, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A promotional text. Nika2020 (talk) 23:41, 24 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As others have said this reads like a promotional text rather than a Wikipedia article. Dunarc (talk) 20:06, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Promotional content --Wario-Man (talk) 04:47, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.