Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anish Dayal Singh

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect‎ to Central Reserve Police Force. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 11:01, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anish Dayal Singh

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Routine announcements about a person's appointment to a rank that is not clearly notable. Fails the Anybio criteria Moem-Meom (talk) 11:50, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Police, Manipur, and Uttar Pradesh. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:21, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep.a rank that is not clearly notable. Clearly some sort of joke. Head of a 314,000 strong police force and previously head of two other large police forces! Very obvious case of WP:SYSTEMIC. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:48, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 15:01, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Being the head of a police force doesn't confer automatic notability. I've gone through pages and pages of search results and only found routine coverage, so I've given up; happy to reconssider if anyone else has better luck or can come up with more useful search terms. Removing "appointed" didn't help me. -- asilvering (talk) 04:59, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. High ranking official, also notable because he was appointed head of SSB (CRPF) very recently! — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheProEditor11 (talk • contribs) 10:17, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, TLA (talk) 11:23, 14 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Policy based input would be helpful
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Star Mississippi 16:24, 21 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Central Reserve Police Force: where he is already mentioned. Sources don't seem to establish independent notability. Owen× ☎ 21:49, 25 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Central Reserve Police Force. BLP, fails GNG and NBIO. Three of four sources are duplicates.

Source eval:

BEFORE found more routine mill news and more copies of #1 above, but nothing meeting WP:IS WP:RS with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth. Article illustrates the lack of sourcing, it is basically just an appointment annoucement with a lot of wikilinks. Ping me if sources with WP:SIGCOV addressing the subject directly and indepth are found. // Timothy :: talk 16:18, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Central Reserve Police Force. As it stands, the subject does not meet the criteria for notability in and of themselves, and is mentioned in the Central Reserve article. PhantomSteve/talk¦contribs\ 08:43, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.