Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annalyn Cyrus (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Michig (talk) 09:36, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Annalyn Cyrus

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable child actress. No indication of notability. No real sources, other than IMDb. It was deleted at AFD in July 2011, and re-created eight months later. I started trying to find sources, and there's nothing really out there other than IMDb, which lists pretty much every actor, notable or not.

It is probably eligible for a G4 Speedy Deletion, but without having seen the prior deleted content, I can't say that it is a "sufficiently identical copy" of the deleted page. TJRC (talk) 04:31, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete again per nom. Legacypac (talk) 04:59, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 06:07, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 06:24, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 06:24, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. ^{Babymissfortune} 06:24, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete the article has absolutely no reliable sources. IMDb is not reliable. Twitter is not reliable. An article like this should be speedy deleted for being on a living person but lacking any reliable sources to demonstrate anything. It is a total violation of our policies on biographies of living people.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:39, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. No RS. Article is clearly orchestrated PROMO by a group of SPA accounts. Agricola44 (talk) 05:52, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.