Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anoosha Syed

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Draftify. There seems to be a rough agreement that though it currently fails TOOSOON and its sources aren't in a state to make a clear indication of notability via NCREATIVE, there is a firm possibility that it will be able to in the future. While there was the suggestion that it require AfC (in effect a variation on salting), there wasn't consensus for that even if it was judged to be within an AfD's authority to determine that. Nosebagbear (talk) 16:44, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Anoosha Syed (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ANYBIO, WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 15:23, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 15:53, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 15:54, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:35, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Move to draft:It is not yet ready, it may make a curve when fully created and verifyable source is added.Rocky 734 (talk) 17:03, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I also support to move it to draft. Störm (talk) 18:35, 16 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete (or draftify). WP:TOOSOON at best. Seems to fail WP:NCREATIVE. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 09:58, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Draftify per WP:TOOSOON, but it would be beneficial to keep this as a draft if more coverage occurs in the future. Aoba47 (talk) 04:32, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Move to draft and require AFC review. I think this definitely fails NCREATIVE and is far too soon. I'd suggest making sure it goes through AFC due to creator's past sourcing issues. Praxidicae (talk) 19:28, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete without drafting Non-notable per nom and not perceived to become notable within the next the few months. Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 19:42, 21 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• If this AfD is closed without relisting, then Draftify. The references are a mess, and it is hard to see what are reviews or descriptions of her work in reliable independent sources, and what are links to publisher's bios or booksellers. Sorting the refs out would be a good start to being able to assess whether the subject meets WP:CREATIVE or not. I'll start doing this, but may not finish and be able to assess notability before it closes. RebeccaGreen (talk) 11:30, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.