Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Metivier
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 07:19, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Anthony Metivier
- Anthony Metivier (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:BLP of a writer with no particularly strong claim to passing WP:AUTHOR, sourced exclusively to primary and unreliable promotional sources, with not a single shred of real media coverage anywhere in the entire article. No prejudice against recreation in the future if someone can write a good and properly sourced article about him, but this version is a delete. Bearcat (talk) 01:06, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:34, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. A total of 2 cites on GS, so not much attention has been paid to his work. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:25, 8 July 2014 (UTC).
- Delete Does not meet notability requirements for an academic.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:07, 8 July 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.