Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthophobia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus not to have an article, no consensus to create a redirect. Sandstein 18:22, 30 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Anthophobia

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

nn coinage, fails WP:MEDRS Staszek Lem (talk) 17:01, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:41, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Behavioural science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 19:41, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:01, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to List of phobias. Maybe someone is knowledgable about those anchored redirects? I always like those, but have never looked into them. But I failed to find any sourcing for this, just some strange horror films. Similar to this deletion discussion here : Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amychophobia (2nd nomination). Yvarta (talk) 01:12, 22 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
delete zero MEDRS sources - no reviews in pubmed; none in PsyNet (can't save searches there- that is just a link to the search page). just another pseudopychnology "fun with greek" term that gets kicked around in garbage lists on the internet. Delete and salt like the rest. Jytdog (talk) 02:44, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to List of phobias. It appears to have at least one book source. It may not be a medical term, but it does have at least one cited reference, so it probably wouldn't hurt to show up on the big list. Definitely doesn't need its own article, of course, but deletion isn't necessary as redirects are WP:CHEAP. Fieari (talk) 03:31, 23 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - if I am to believe GoogleBooks, the entire entry from the cited reference is"antophobia Fear of flowers. See also Flowers, fear of." So I do not buy that as a serious claim that the word is in use; hence, not even a redirect. Tigraan^{Click here to contact me} 11:22, 29 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.