Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anticancer Fund

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sandstein 10:46, 15 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Anticancer Fund

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about an organisation which does not seem to meet WP:GNG or WP:ORGDEPTH, The current references are primary or connected to the organisation. Searches bring up several mentions or statements by fund members but I couldn't find anything which significantly discusses the organisation. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 15:24, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 15:25, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions. McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 15:25, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete - There are numerous reliable sources on the subject upon a quick google search however, most only mention Anticancer Fund in passing. Meatsgains (talk) 22:55, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:04, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. I've found some reasonable references.Rathfelder (talk) 17:04, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. User Rathfelder has added some references to the article and I think WP:GNG and WP:ORGDEPTH are met. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 14:03, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 21:20, 9 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.