Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anuj Vihar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 11:30, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Anuj Vihar (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No single reference in support of the article. Gauravs 51 (talk) 15:06, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Delhi-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 15:11, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Skynxnex (talk) 16:11, 3 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:MILL. Although some websites advertise to rent in this as a neighborhood, it's an army barracks. That's it. Bearian (talk) 02:42, 8 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Not eligible for soft-deletion as a contested prod. Relisting for further input.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel (talk) 16:09, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete WP:MILL doesn't really apply, but WP:GNG does. I cannot find significant coverage of this area/locality/neighbourhood. SportingFlyer T·C 05:50, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.