Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/AppRiver

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 08:52, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AppRiver (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

a Typical press coverage on media. Non-notable as per encyclopedic standards. Only exist to promote themselves online. Light2021 (talk) 17:00, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:11, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:16, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:20, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep AppRiver - AppRiver has also won NUMEROUS awards since its inception and has seen tremendous growth in the past 15 years. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Teresaz0175 (talk • contribs) 16:48, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

— Teresaz0175 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

• Note – I removed part of the text in the !vote directly above because is consisted of copyright infringement of content here. The copyvio has also been rev-deleted from this page. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:04, 18 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as corporate spam; notability not established. Typical promo content consisting of routine product news, partnerships and "Awards & Recognition". The one keep vote is by a SPA. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:20, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:SPIP and WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 16:07, 19 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.