Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/App Annie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus is for deletion. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 09:57, 4 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

App Annie

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Undisclosed COI work and the article's athuor's only-ever creation. Reads severly like an advertisment and in a bullet-point list. The second section is entirely unsourced and the first lacks citations in several places. Lordtobi (✉) 05:56, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor 06:41, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor 06:41, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor 06:41, 20 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Entirely promotional. Fails WP:NCORP. If the spam was removed, there would be a very small article. May survive on it. scope_creep (talk) 22:24, 23 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor 08:34, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: does not meet WP:NCORP; sources are passing mentions and / or WP:SPIP. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:29, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I cannot locate any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability, article is also promotional. Fails WP:SPIP, GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺14:57, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.