Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Appsfire
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:41, 27 October 2018 (UTC)
Appsfire
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Appsfire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet WP:NCORP; significant RS coverage not found. What comes up is passing metions, routine funding news, and / or WP:SPIP. Created by Special:Contributions/IR-Articles, part of an apparent paid editing ring; see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Morning277. The company had been sold to a nn firm, so no suitable redirect target exists. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:24, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:41, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:41, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Israel-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:41, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 04:42, 12 October 2018 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 15:08, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 15:08, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Less than 50 employees, sold for 30M$. The application itself is possibly borderline notable as software. The company doesn't pass sourcing requirements in WP:NORG. Icewhiz (talk) 12:08, 21 October 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Agree with nom, no indications of notability, a run-of-the-mill software company. There are some references that discuss their app but fail WP:CORPDEPTH, others are rehashing of company information and announcements, fails WP:ORGIND. Topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing++ 17:22, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.